Ego and God's need for worship
I subscribe to her ideas of rational self interest or The Virtue of Selfishness.
I also subscribe to her premise that contradictions cannot exist. She said in "Atlas Shrugged":
In my previous post, I suggested that:"Contradictions do not exist. Whenever you think you are facing a
contradiction, check your premises. You will find that one of them is
wrong."
I also believe that a benevolent god wouldn't care whether someone worshipped or
even acknowledged him. It would be enough for his "grace" to simply be a good
person who consistently, honestly tries to improve themselves and the world
around them by upholding and promoting values that are in line with that god's
values. Worship would not be one of those values. A desire for worship is an
egotistical thing, and a benevolent god would not be egotistical.
Since contradictions can't exist, I'll check my premises.
Premise One: A god that desires worship is egotistical.
Premise Two: An egotistical god is not benevolent and good.
Premise Three: Egotistical (to me, and in my context) equals pride.
Premise Four: (My belief) Pride is a good thing, when deserved. It is ok to be proud of your accomplishments and worth.
Here is where the conflict exists: I believe that a "proud" god who desires worship and adoration could not possible be good and benevolent. I also believe that I can be good and proud at the same time. I can be good and desire others to recognize that I am good and successful and worthy of praise.
Both can't be true. Either pride is good or it is evil. The bible teaches us that pride is evil(http://www.24-7-bible.com/American-Standard-Version.html?BibleSearchTerm=pride&BibleBook=100&bibleOffset=1), yet God desires praise and is therefore proudhttp://www.24-7-bible.com/American-Standard-Version.html?BibleSearchTerm=praise&BibleBook=100.
So, can this be reconciled? I believe it can. In order to do so, we have to accept a couple of temporary hypotheses:
Hypotheses #1: God is all-powerful (note: I am not saying that this is true. I am only reconciling a specific contradiction in my philosophy. I'll constantly use the word "if" in my discussions. Because I don't know the truth.)
Hypotheses #2: Man is not all-powerful
Here is a fact that is important in this discussion: Pride is referred to in the bible primarily in the context of man (or Lucifer in one case) considering himself "better than God." The bible does not, as nearly as I can tell, equate pride with our more modern definition that is primarily related to a high sense of self worth, dignity or value. The bible is referring to pride as an unfounded, arrogant, inaccurately high sense of self worth. Inaccurate is the key here.
So, with that fact in hand, let's examine the statements. If God is all powerful, and man is not, then God is "better" than man. That does not say that man is bad. So, any man who thinks that he is better than God would be wrong. God, on the other hand, if the hypothesis were true, would naturally be better than any man. Therefore, would have the right, under my beliefs, to place himself "above" man.
If you believe as I do, that being wrong about something contributes to our own personal weakness, or even destruction, and that anything that contributes to our own personal weakness or destruction is evil, then according to my beliefs, misplaced pride would be evil. It blinds us to the possibility of improvement. So a man believing that he is better than an all powerful god would be suffering from his pride, and that pride would be evil, because it contributes to his own weakness.
On the other hand, if God is all-powerful, then He deserves his sense of self worth. But if there is a possibility that God is not all-powerful, then He doesn't.
I'm not going to even attempt to go after that one just yet. I'm just getting started on this whole theology thing, and am not equipped to reason that one out yet.
My mind sometimes works faster than my fingers. I'm a pretty smart guy, and I'm proud of that fact. I don't view that as an evil pride. I am a smart guy. That is a fact. I derive a great deal of pleasure and self-worth from the fact that I am a smart guy. I don't for one second believe that I'm the smartest guy in the world. That would be the bad version of pride, and would limit me and my thinking, because I would have to believe that only my own thoughts and interpretations were correct. I would have to deny the possibility of truths that I didn't yet understand.
My point is this: The concept of a benevolent god who is proud and requests acknowledgement and praise is not antithetical (sp?) to itself. If there is a Benevolent god, then it's okay for he/she/it to say, "Hey, I've done a lot of stuff for you. Would you give me a little credit here?"
So, to sum it up, after checking my premises, I've decided that Premise #2 is false. An egotistical (or proud) god who requests acknowledgement and praise is not inherently evil, so that god can be benevolent. Chalk one up for rational thinking. God, if you are reading, you get a point on this one. But we ain't done yet.
The follow up question, which I'll have to address another time is this: Can a benevolent god request acknowledgement and praise, with no proof? Or is god willing to prove his existence and abilities, and the nature of his power to mere mortals in a quantifiable, scientifically measurable manner before requesting that praise and acknowledgement.
In other words, "What's the deal with this Blind Faith thing?"
I believe that blind faith is evil, because it contributes to our destruction, and weakens our mind and free will.
But, I've got work to do, so I'm not gonna tackle that one yet.
Before I can come to rest on some of these beliefs, I'm going to have to address Blind Faith. I'll get there, eventually.
(Hint: I'm not so sure that blind faith is required, but I don't know yet.)